This website or its third-party tools use cookies, which are necessary to its functioning and required to achieve the purposes illustrated in the cookie policy. By closing this banner, scrolling this page, clicking a link or continuing to browse otherwise, you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Popular Course in this category. Course Price View Course. Free Software Development Course. Login details for this Free course will be emailed to you. Email ID. Contact No. This is not the case for FreeBSD, which remains largely neglected for that reason. The Linux kernel makes writing and distributing software programs simpler as compared to other kernels, so developers are naturally inclined to work towards Linux releases.
The distribution, especially, is made even easier by the pre-installed binary package system that it facilitates. Linux allows software packages to be downloaded and installed via package managers such as apt, yum, Pacman, etc. As compared to software distribution in Linux, BSD users have it much hard.
The software packages are first downloaded as source codes in BSD via the ports system. This is equally frustrating for the developers, as they have to put in a whole lot of effort to make compiling as quickly as possible. Although the introduction of pre-compiled binary packages has largely mitigated the process of getting software in FreeBSD, software availability still remains an enormous problem for BSDs. Aside from the more mainstream Windows and IOS, Linux distributions are leaps and bounds ahead of any other operating systems out there.
It is free, open-source, and has everything to offer that FreeBSD has, without the caveats. BSD and Linux are a lot more common than they are different, with licensing and software distribution being the only core differences. Still, despite the similarities, using one is a trade-off of another. On one hand, FreeBSD maintains a library of tools and dependencies across all distributions, making it easier for the developers to iterate on the contents and come up with applications of their own.
But on the other hand, the lack of software compatibility and availability severely hinders the experience with FreeBSD. This problem can be solved by using the Linux compatibility package, which allows Linux software to run on BSD distributions, but this is one extra step that still hinders the experience, nonetheless.
Developers or users cannot make variations to the Linux kernel or sourcecode without making it public. To be able to keep the source code private is a considerable advantage that Linux fails to provide. As mentioned in the Wikipedia article, OpenZFS is an umbrella project aimed at bringing together individuals and companies that use the ZFS file system and work on its improvements, aiming as well at making ZFS more widely used and developed in an open-source manner.
High-level goals of the project include raising awareness of the quality, utility and availability of open-source implementations of ZFS, encouraging open communication about ongoing efforts toward improving open-source variants of ZFS, and ensuring consistent reliability, functionality and performance of all distributions of ZFS.
OpenZFS on Linux , which is the Linux part of the project, has currently active contributors with more that 5.
In another situation Linus Torvalds gave an interview on TFiR: open source and Emerging Tech YouTube channel about Linux on the desktop in which he makes another amazing statement saying that Linux still isn't ready for the desktop and that perhaps Chrome OS is the solution to that problem. These and many other statements by Linus Torvalds show that Linux as an operating system has no real direction and no clear management because the kernel development is performed in isolation from the rest of the Linux world.
Linus Torvalds is generally also very open to the rapid influence by corporate interests and his perspective on security is also worrying. At LinuxCon , he said that he thinks the bloat situation is better because modern PCs are a lot faster!
When software gets bloated it not only becomes more insecure and more error prone, but it also becomes much slower. Thinking that the problem goes away because hardware becomes faster is an immature attitude. In this day and age we need to optimize software so that less power is required, we need to save power and limit pollution.
Besides from the above mentioned problems, the fact of the matter is that Linux as an operating system is put together by different applications from different projects that has absolutely nothing to do with each other. If you don't know anything about this you should take a look at how you build Linux From Scratch.
Another good read that demonstrates some of these problems is the article Linux maintains bugs: The real reason ifconfig on Linux is deprecated. The kernel, the standard C library, the user land tools, etc. I am sure by now you all know that Linux is just a kernel, while OpenBSD is a complete Unix system: kernel, device drivers, libraries, userland, development environment, documentation, and all the tools you need to continue doing development. That said, based just on completeness of functionality, it is not handled like a Linux distribution, not at all.
When we find that a change must be made to the system security or otherwise we can therefore force such a change into the system by changing it all the way from userland through the libraries down to the kernel. We can change interfaces as we want to. We can move quickly. Sometimes changes are even made which break previous executables; but if we need to, we can choose to make such decisions. This gives us great flexibility to move forward fast.
If something is designed wrong, and the fix depends on changes in more than just the kernel, we can fix it by.
We change all the required pieces in the right places. In my article The real motivation behind systemd I have written about how the primary reason for developing systemd is Red Hats financial interests in embedded devices, primarily at the U. Military and the automobile industry. Initially systemd was released as a new init system, but it has slowly grown into what Poettering describes as "a suite of software that provides fundamental building blocks for a Linux operating system.
I have nothing against the "init" part of systemd, but systemd is no longer just an init system, and the main problem with systemd is that its continued development is motivated by a company's financial interests and not the open source community interests. They have made themselves heavily dependent upon systemd and Red Hat. This is pure speculation, but I must also admit that I suspect systemd to be a platform for introducing security holes into the Linux operating system.
These will of course look like normal "programming mistakes", however some of these bugs resembles what happened with the OpenSSL Heartbleed bug quite a lot. And it is a well know strategy used in the open source community, to use "programming mistakes" to create backdoors and other issues.
Another heavy influence on the Linux world is Google. Chrome OS is viewed as a competitor to Microsoft, both directly to Microsoft Windows and indirectly the company's word processing and spreadsheet applications, the latter through Chrome OS's reliance on cloud computing.
And this is one of the core problems with Chrome OS, it is built with great reliance of Googles cloud infrastructure. Google has become one of the most controversial companies. Google is in its essence an advertisement company and it has become famous for their manipulation of search results and extreme user tracking capabilities, mainly thanks to the stupidity of web developers adding Google Analytics to their websites.
In a YouTube video from August by Linus Tech Tips , Linus Sebastian demonstrates how tracking on the Internet works and how it affects the prices you get offered when you search for products. Please note : The video was sponsored by Private Internet Access, a company that has since been bought by Kape Technologies which is known for sending malware through their software and for being really scummy in general.
0コメント